| Author : - Jean Caillard , ex Test
Pilot, full text published with the authorisation of the Author. Text
is protected by Copyright
|
T
he Gardan Horizon is an all metal
four-seat touring aircraft. It's silhouette, a little "old
fashioned", it's undercarriage appears to be a little narrow, it
is nevertheless very comfortable and will accept a high cross-wind.
Flying since 21/7/1960, 259 were built, fitted with Lycomings of
160hp and 180hp. It was certified in the "normal" category,
all aerobatics are forbidden.
The aircraft being declared
"Airworthy", oil and fuel levels checked, the pre-flight
check is classic and calls for no comments.
Installation in the aircraft. The climb
onto the wing root requires a decent leg length, then access to the
cockpit is easy thanks to the doors which open partially into the
cabin roof. The door closing is assured by a normal catch at shoulder
level and by a turn-lock in the upper part of the door at cabin roof
level. This is an essential part of the check-list, leaving the catch
un-done will cause the door to billow outwards in flight. Seat
positioned, seat belt tight, all the controls are easily accessible.
Start-up. Parking brake "on",
fuel selector "open", battery "on", propeller
fully fine, mixture fully rich, fuel pump "on", 4-5
injections on the throttle, then throttle open 2cm, clear prop -
start. The engine idles at 1200 rpm, fuel pump "off",
generator "on".
Taxiing. The aircraft is steered easily
on the ground with the rudder bar, but avoid excessive speed, the
brakes have a limited efficiency.
Run-up. ( Oil temperature at 40° or
carburettor re-heat on if conditions dictate ) At 2 200rpm, cycle the
propeller twice. The control for the propeller is a fine thread with
a rapid manual override. Select magnetos at 2 200rpm with pitch fully
fine, the tolerance for the rpm loss is 125rpm. Check generator is
giving current.Fuel pump "on", doors locked
and checked - do not forget to check upper lock, trim neutral to
slight nose-up, gyro compass set, mixture fully rich.
|
T ake-off, throttle fully open, lift the
nose wheel at 50kt, the wheels will unstick at around 65kt. Take-off
distance about 300m, zero wind conditions at sea level. A 15m
obstacle is passed at 600m. Climb out is at 70kt, brake the spinning
wheels and raise the undercarriage - 19 turns of the handle. The
green light will go out and the red light comes on when the
undercarriage is in the UP position. There is practically no adverse
yaw, the aircraft is well balanced. The loading to maintain 70kt is
1kg. Fuel pump "off", throttle back to 2 450rpm and coarsen
the pitch to 25" on the admission. Climb will be at 700 ft/min
at sea level with full load.
In Flight. Engine settings for cruise
at say 3000 feet will be, at 75%, 120kt TAS. At 8 000 feet TAS will
be 124kt. Maximum still-air range, without reserves is 1 250 km.
The flight controls are precise and
harmonious, with very little friction. The longitudinal stability is
correct and the effort gradient is in the order of 1,5kg/ 10kt.
power. Pulling back on the column to reduce speed by about 10kt, the
aircraft recovers to level flight after 1 or 2 oscillations. The
effort on the column in a 60° bank in level flight at 115 kt is
between 3 and 5 kg, according to C of G. Directional and lateral
stability are good, the loading on the column increases in an out of
balance turn. The recovery from a slip is within two ball diameters.
The recovery from roll is clean and without oscillation.
Stall. Throttle closed, aircraft at 70
kt with the trim at full nose up, a slow deceleration, a weak pull on
the column, the stall warning comes in at 58 kt, there is vibration
at 55 kt, but the aircraft has immediate recovery.
The approach. The aircraft initially
trimmed at 80 kt, the lowering of the undercarriage, lock in position
"down" and again 19 turns of the handle, the red light
comes on, and then goes out when the undercarriage is fully down and
the green light comes on. The lowering of the undercarriage requires
a push on the column to maintain 70 kt. Longitudinal stability is
correct. A balanced set up is 70 kt, 500 feet / min decent at 2 000
rpm, at 14" admission. The effort gradient is less than in level
flight, but with light friction in the controls the correction is
clean. The loads in directional stability increase normally with the
slip. Lateral stability remains the same, with the aircraft inclined,
releasing the ailerons leaves the aircraft inclined if the rudder
pressure is maintained. This causes no difficulty to the pilot. The
stall with throttle closed, aircraft trimmed to 80 kt, trim fully
nose-up, light loads on the column, but correct signs, stall warning
at 54 kt, minimum IAS at around 49 kt with a load at 850 kg.
On go-around from an IAS of 70 kt,
there is a distinct effort to push the column of about 5 to 6 kg to
maintain 70 kt.Landing. Nothing significant except a
tendency towards nose-wheel shimmy if it is landed at too high a
speed. The efficiency of the brakes is mediocre, they are
"slower-downers" more than proper brakes.
.
I
n conclusion, a very agreeable and
docile aircraft, homogenous and precise controls, honest performance,
with a useful carrying capacity - only negatives are the shimmy on
the nose wheel and the poor brakes.
EDITOR'S note. As a regular pilot of
this aircraft, there is not a lot to add to this article from Jean
CAILLARD, I will allow myself one comment, the small movements of the
control yoke need to be made to avoid over movement of the ailerons,
so as not to find yourself in undesired positions, but this is mainly
a question of habit. The flaps are of course coupled to the
undercarriage, you have therefore two possibilities, undercarriage
up, flaps up, or undercarriage down, flaps down.. Lastly concerning
comfort, understand that the seats for pilot and passenger are
"rustic", this means a thin cushion of sponge on a wooden
plank. This is as part of the charm of this aircraft as are it's
flying qualities - even after 40 years. The MAPICA would like to take this
opportunity to thank Jean CAILLARD for having written this article,
which is of course, more an "appreciation" of the aircraft
rather than a true "Flight Test".
|
|